Showing posts with label s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label s. Show all posts
Monday, March 23, 2015
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT S AWC Review Bigger Or Cheaper Would Be Better

In Canada, Outlanders start at $27,448. But the GT S-AWC starts at $37,648 with all-wheel-drive, a 6-speed automatic transmission, and a V6 engine in place of the 4-cylinder/CVT combo. A $2730 navigation package and $160 pearlescent paint boost the as-tested price beyond $40,000.
| THE GOOD • Decent ride/handling mix • Nicely weighted steering • Impressive Rockford Fosgate • Available third row • Only one in the parking lot | THE BAD • Such tiny buttons • Interior feels ancient • $40K+? • Third row is tight, cramps cargo • LDW, FCW, but no BSM? |
The issue isn’t the manner in which the Outlander’s MSRP compares to the price of other similarly sized two-row utility vehicles. Rather, the problem as I see it is Mitsubishis desire to charge the kind of money other automakers are charging for genuine three-row family crossovers.
• Historical Monthly & Yearly Mitsubishi Outlander Sales Figures
• 2014 Nissan Rogue SL Driven Review
Granted, the Outlander isn’t deserving of criticism because it fails so miserably in any one facet. In fact, the Outlander is simply mediocre in every way. It therefore quickly becomes forgettable, not worthy of mention for any reason other than the combination of tidy exterior dimensions with seven-passenger seating.
Perhaps we got off to a rough start, the Mitsubishi Canada-supplied Outlander and I. Although I’ve read multiple accounts from other publications describing the fits-all-sizes comfort of the Outlander’s driver’s seat, I spent a week failing to find the proper setup for my lanky frame. It’s a personal concern, one which may not apply to your body type, but a seat cushion lacking length and a limited amount of overall adjustment led me to a state of constant discontent.

2015 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER GT S-AWC Base Price: $37,648 * As-Tested Price: $40,538 * Engine: 3.0L 24-valve SOHC V6 Transmission: 6-speed automatic Horsepower: 227 @ 6250 rpm Torque: 215 lb-ft @ 3750 rpm Curb Weight: 3571 pounds Drive Type: all-wheel-drive Length: 183.3 inches Width: 71.3 inches Height: 66.1 inches Wheelbase: 105.1 inches Tires: Toyo A24 Tire Size: 225/45R18 Passenger Volume: 3630 litres Cargo Volume: 292 litres CV Behind 2nd Row: 968 litres Max. Cargo Volume: 1792 litres EPA City: 20 mpg EPA Hwy: 28 mpg NRCAN OEE City: 11.5 L/100km NRCAN OEE Hwy: 8.4 L/100km Observed: 21.4 mpg Observed: 11.0 L/100km * Canadian dollars, includes $1450 destination charge. Outlander base price: $27,448 Outlander AWD base price: $29,448 Outlander V6 AWD 7-seat base price: $32,648 MPG fuel economy ratings from the Environmental Protection Agency. L/100km ratings from the Canadian Office of Energy Efficiencys new 5-cycle testing for MY2015 vehicles. |
As it stands, this isn’t so much a third row for emergencies as it is a third row for emergencies in which you literally take prisoners. The same can’t be said for the third row in the Dodge Durango, which can be had for less money.
Regardless of the row you inhabit, the overall sensation delivered by the 183-inch-long Outlander’s interior does not pertain to smallness or largeness but to cheapness. This feels like 2007-grade material quality. Although all of the third-generation Outlander’s body parts are different from the second-gen’s, at its core this feels like a lighter, updated version of a vehicle which debuted in second-gen form for MY2007.
Interior controls are simple enough, but the buttons surrounding the Rockford Fosgate radio unit are tiny and chintzy.
The cabin isn’t what you’d call loud, nor is it quiet. One unfortunate caress of the headliner will lead you to believe Mitsubishi sourced the fabric from the late 80s. There are hard, scuffable plastics everywhere you look and touch. This is not the interior of a Toyota Highlander, which can be had for less money.
In motion, the Outlander does redeem itself somewhat. The electrically assisted power steering is nicely weighted and promptly responsive. Ride quality isn’t reflective of the Outlander’s 105.1-inch wheelbase as the comfort-minded suspension and stiff structure don’t allow particularly harsh impacts to transfer to the Outlander’s occupants.
There’s even an initial sense of discreet sportiness, although the Outlander doesn’t possess the limits of the Mazda CX-5, for instance. Instead, when pushed only slightly, the Outlander is more composed than many of the most dynamic small crossovers, but it falls apart more quickly if you decide to drive more enthusiastically than most small crossover owners would.
![]() |
| All Photo Credits: Timothy Cain ©www.GoodCarBadCar.net Click Any Of Images For A Larger View |
I wouldn’t bother to draw attention to much larger competition like the Durango (201 inches long), Highlander (191), or Santa Fe (193) if the Outlander lived up to its window sticker, its spec sheet, and its options list.

• 2014 Kia Sorento SX Driven Review
• 2013 Dodge Journey R/T Rallye Driven Review
If you can find your local Mitsubishi dealer, you’ll discover that the Outlander won’t be the slowest or the thirstiest SUV. It won’t be the smallest, nor will it be the largest. The Outlander isn’t the most overindulgent, nor is it the most under-equipped. It’s not the prettiest, nor is it the ugliest. It’s not fun to drive like some small crossovers, but it’s not annoying like some others. As a result of its failure to do any one thing particularly well, the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT S-AWC is thoroughly underwhelming. Im not inclined to call it a bad vehicle – the Outlander is average in too many ways to earn such a label. Its price, however, is not average. For less money, you can do better.
Perhaps we shouldn’t expect modern results without modern kit underhood. And perhaps we shouldn’t be charged modern prices for outdated vehicles. So say the tens of thousands of small crossover buyers who reject the Outlander each month. For every Outlander sold in Canada over the first ten months of 2014, its three most direct three-row competitors – Rogue, Sorento, Journey – have generated 13 sales. But can Mitsubishi do better? You bet they can, and a plug-in hybrid version of the Outlander is coming in the near future. If nothing else, that level of technology will be something that sets the Outlander apart.
Friday, March 20, 2015
2011 Porsche Boxster S Black Edition
PORSCHE BOXSTER S BLACK EDITION


The Porsche Boxster, always nice. For many, the Boxster is a model of entry. In fact it is a car that can discover and experience, at lower costs, the pleasures of the legendary sports car manufacturer. In its design, Porsche has clearly put the emphasis on driving pleasure rather than on performance and the fact that it is proposed that emphasizes convertible this trait. Moreover, if for some builders, entry-level models are not particularly attractive, the Boxster is anything but a low-class Porsche. It is beautifully done and delivers more than reasonable performance for its price. So much for the purists, his brother, the Cayman coupe, which serves as an entry-level racing car at the German manufacturer.

This small Porsche gets basically a six-cylinder engine of 2.9 liter 255 horsepower power. This may seem relatively small for a sports car, but when one considers the weight of the car, it is clear that the level of performance is enviable. The Boxster S with its 3.4-liter V6 and 310 horses, turned a small convertible into a real dragster from 0-100 km / h in under five seconds, 4.6 in the case of Black Boxster Edition equipped with sequential gearbox PDK and Sport Package Plus.

Thursday, March 19, 2015
July 2014 U S SUV And Crossover Sales Rankings Top 89 Best Selling SUVs In America Every SUV Ranked
Yet the second-generation Rogue has nevertheless proven to be one of Nissans stars. Its Nissans second-best-selling model. Year-to-date, Rogue volume is up 21% in a market thats up 5%; in a vehicle category thats up 12%.
At this stage last year, the Rogue was 82,926 sales back of the leading SUV. The Rogue has closed the gap by nearly 16,000 units in 2014.
• U.S. SUV/Crossover Sales Rankings By Model - August 2014 YTD
• U.S. SUV/Crossover Sales Rankings By Model - June 2014 YTD
• U.S. SUV/Crossover Sales Rankings By Model - July 2013 YTD
The Rogue is a top seller, but Nissans steady ascent has not yet made it the top seller. That role belongs to the Honda CR-V, just as it did at this stage two years ago. The CR-V trailed the Ford Escape by 5980 units at the seven-month mark in 2013 but ended the year as Americas top-selling utility vehicle after generating 130,915 sales in the final five months of 2013.
Moreover, the Rogue is competing with other vehicles which are also steadily increasing their U.S. sales tallies, though not quite as quickly. July was the Toyota RAV4s best-ever sales month - RAV4 sales are up 19% in 2014.
Embattled GM has produced improved Chevrolet Equinox sales in each of the last five years, and against the grain of the news, produced a 37% jump in Equinox sales in July.

The Rogue is more than a symbol of Nissans U.S. auto market success. But taken as a symbol, its a very meaningful one.
• Top 13 Best-Selling Pickup Trucks In America - July 2014 YTD
• Commercial Van Sales In America - July 2014 YTD
• Minivan Sales In America - July 2014 YTD
There were important improvements introduced in last Octobers ranking of SUV/crossover sales. Prior year figures now include the actual numbers from last year, not just the percentage increase from last year. As a result, weve included vehicles like the Suzuki Grand Vitara and Honda Element, nameplates which collected sales in the first half of 2013 but not this year. At any time, click the Rank column to return to the original format. If youre on a mobile device, you may need to choose the full version of the site (at the bottom of the page) in order to use the sortable function.
• U.S. Auto Sales Brand Rankings - July 2014 YTD
• U.S. Car Sales Rankings - July 2014 YTD
• U.S. Vehicle Sales Rankings - July 2014 YTD
Reminder: these are 2014 year-to-date rankings, but you can sort SUVs and crossovers by July volume by clicking the July 2014 column header, or you can rank vehicles by improvements or declines using the % columns. Or, most importantly, you can list automakers together by selecting the SUV/Crossover column header.
As always, you can find historical monthly and yearly sales figures for any of these vehicles by selecting a make and model at GCBCs Sales Stats page.
Click Column Headers To Sort • August 2014 • June 2014 • July 2013
Rank | SUV/Crossover | July 2014 YTD | July 2013 YTD | % Change | July 2014 | July 2013 | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Honda CR-V | 183,214 | 172,989 | 5.9% | 28,522 | 27,226 | 4.8% |
| #2 | Ford Escape | 179,448 | 178,969 | 0.3% | 26,558 | 22,343 | 18.9% |
| #3 | Chevrolet Equinox | 146,152 | 144,904 | 0.9% | 25,321 | 18,507 | 36.8% |
| #4 | Toyota RAV4 | 143,731 | 120,812 | 19.0% | 26,779 | 19,538 | 37.1% |
| #5 | Ford Explorer | 123,466 | 115,332 | 7.1% | 19,006 | 14,089 | 34.9% |
| #5.1 | Ford Explorer * | 111,785 | 108,044 | 3.5% | 16,797 | 12,742 | 31.8% |
| #5.2 | Ford Explorer Police Interceptor * | 11,681 | 7288 | 60.3% | 2209 | 1347 | 64.0% |
| #6 | Nissan Rogue | 115,920 | 96,043 | 20.7% | 16,618 | 16,992 | -2.2% |
| #7 | Jeep Grand Cherokee | 104,782 | 95,815 | 9.4% | 15,169 | 15,019 | 1.0% |
| #8 | Jeep Wrangler | 102,125 | 92,132 | 10.8% | 16,388 | 14,404 | 13.8% |
| #9 | Jeep Cherokee | 95,259 | --- | --- | 14,827 | --- | --- |
| #10 | Subaru Forester | 88,924 | 60,589 | 46.8% | 14,524 | 9841 | 47.6% |
| #11 | Toyota Highlander | 83,495 | 72,679 | 14.9% | 11,357 | 10,908 | 4.1% |
| #12 | Ford Edge | 69,632 | 79,512 | -12.4% | 8564 | 10,541 | -18.8% |
| #13 | Honda Pilot | 61,613 | 75,819 | -18.7% | 10,933 | 12,932 | -15.5% |
| #14 | Chevrolet Traverse | 61,586 | 60,910 | 1.1% | 9533 | 7616 | 25.2% |
| #15 | GMC Terrain | 61,454 | 58,531 | 5.0% | 10,767 | 7855 | 37.1% |
| #16 | Kia Sorento | 60,670 | 62,963 | -3.6% | 8749 | 9576 | -8.6% |
| #17 | Hyundai Santa Fe | 60,660 | 48,003 | 26.4% | 8655 | 6845 | 26.4% |
| #18 | Mazda CX-5 | 59,384 | 45,880 | 29.4% | 9109 | 7825 | 16.4% |
| #19 | Lexus RX | 56,922 | 54,255 | 4.9% | 9658 | 8437 | 14.5% |
| #20 | Chevrolet Tahoe | 56,621 | 47,976 | 18.0% | 10,783 | 7119 | 51.5% |
| #21 | Dodge Journey | 54,309 | 48,944 | 11.0% | 7158 | 6508 | 10.0% |
| #22 | Jeep Patriot | 51,721 | 45,687 | 13.2% | 7793 | 7572 | 2.9% |
| #23 | GMC Acadia | 49,265 | 54,056 | -8.9% | 8095 | 7564 | 7.0% |
| #24 | Nissan Pathfinder | 47,328 | 54,967 | -13.9% | 7364 | 8428 | -12.6% |
| #25 | Toyota 4Runner | 41,955 | 29,476 | 42.3% | 6662 | 4049 | 64.5% |
| #26 | Jeep Compass | 38,503 | 32,000 | 20.3% | 5411 | 5222 | 3.6% |
| #27 | Dodge Durango | 37,682 | 33,440 | 12.7% | 4807 | 5135 | -6.4% |
| #28 | Acura MDX | 36,947 | 23,765 | 55.5% | 6283 | 5551 | 13.2% |
| #29 | Buick Enclave | 35,408 | 36,804 | -3.8% | 5266 | 4963 | 6.1% |
| #30 | Cadillac SRX | 33,463 | 28,933 | 15.7% | 4599 | 4943 | -7.0% |
| #31 | Chevrolet Captiva Sport | 33,308 | 27,310 | 22.0% | 4497 | 2548 | 76.5% |
| #32 | Chevrolet Suburban | 28,739 | 27,844 | 3.2% | 5168 | 6181 | -16.4% |
| #33 | Hyundai Tucson | 28,103 | 26,156 | 7.4% | 3767 | 3949 | -4.6% |
| #34 | Nissan Juke | 28,086 | 21,357 | 31.5% | 2325 | 3579 | -35.0% |
| #35 | Buick Encore | 27,718 | 15,428 | 79.7% | 4061 | 3176 | 27.9% |
| #36 | Ford Expedition | 26,470 | 20,485 | 29.2% | 4371 | 2744 | 59.3% |
| #37 | Acura RDX | 25,881 | 26,136 | -1.0% | 3532 | 3936 | -10.3% |
| #38 | Mercedes-Benz M-Class | 25,216 | 22,404 | 12.6% | 3276 | 3092 | 6.0% |
| #39 | BMW X5 | 25,126 | 24,133 | 4.1% | 2688 | 2674 | 0.5% |
| #40 | Nissan Murano | 25,065 | 24,374 | 2.8% | 4640 | 3787 | 22.5% |
| #41 | Kia Sportage | 24,368 | 17,897 | 36.2% | 4412 | 2523 | 74.9% |
| #42 | BMW X3 | 23,367 | 16,339 | 43.0% | 1565 | 2099 | -25.4% |
| #43 | Audi Q5 | 23,117 | 21,486 | 7.6% | 3189 | 3176 | 0.4% |
| #44 | GMC Yukon | 22,743 | 14,895 | 52.7% | 4139 | 2790 | 48.4% |
| #45 | Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class | 22,508 | 18,526 | 21.5% | 3870 | 2780 | 39.2% |
| #46 | Mitsubishi Outlander Sport | 17,932 | 14,522 | 23.5% | 2610 | 2075 | 25.8% |
| #47 | Infiniti QX60/JX | 17,831 | 17,530 | 1.7% | 2232 | 2747 | -18.7% |
| #48 | GMC Yukon XL | 16,444 | 17,847 | -7.9% | 3999 | 3143 | 27.2% |
| #49 | Volkswagen Tiguan | 15,295 | 17,796 | -14.1% | 2121 | 2270 | -6.6% |
| #50 | Lincoln MKX | 15,080 | 13,653 | 10.5% | 1983 | 2002 | -0.9% |
| #51 | Ford Flex | 14,884 | 15,525 | -4.1% | 1895 | 2689 | -29.5% |
| #52 | Cadillac Escalade | 14,300 | 11,297 | 26.6% | 3894 | 1793 | 117% |
| #52.1 | Cadillac Escalade * | 9138 | 6782 | 34.7% | 2467 | 1105 | 123% |
| #52.2 | Cadillac Escalade ESV * | 5162 | 4515 | 14.3% | 1427 | 688 | 107% |
| #53 | Mercedes-Benz GL-Class | 13,366 | 17,111 | -21.9% | 1640 | 2165 | -24.2% |
| #54 | Mini Countryman | 12,804 | 12,774 | 0.2% | 2183 | 2211 | -1.3% |
| #55 | BMW X1 | 12,314 | 14,226 | -13.4% | 1003 | 2157 | -53.5% |
| #56 | Lexus GX460 | 12,231 | 5296 | 131% | 1955 | 881 | 122% |
| #57 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 11,420 | 7947 | 43.7% | 1614 | 752 | 115% |
| #58 | Mazda CX-9 | 10,931 | 16,756 | -34.8% | 1678 | 2084 | -19.5% |
| #59 | Nissan Xterra | 10,838 | 11,326 | -4.3% | 1073 | 1218 | -11.9% |
| #60 | Volvo XC60 | 10,516 | 12,293 | -14.5% | 1732 | 1740 | -0.5% |
| #61 | Porsche Cayenne | 10,259 | 11,082 | -7.4% | 1546 | 1563 | -1.1% |
| #62 | Audi Q7 | 9881 | 7908 | 24.9% | 1446 | 1328 | 8.9% |
| #63 | Toyota FJ Cruiser | 9661 | 7854 | 23.0% | 1424 | 1260 | 13.0% |
| #64 | Mitsubishi Outlander | 7967 | 6355 | 25.4% | 951 | 1268 | -25.0% |
| #65 | Nissan Armada | 7405 | 8487 | -12.7% | 948 | 1106 | -14.3% |
| #66 | Land Rover Range Rover | 7238 | 6740 | 7.4% | 1273 | 1420 | -10.4% |
| #67 | Infiniti QX80/QX56 | 7170 | 6747 | 6.3% | 952 | 780 | 22.1% |
| #68 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | 7164 | 6393 | 12.1% | 888 | 953 | -6.8% |
| #69 | Toyota Sequoia | 6901 | 7765 | -11.1% | 971 | 1072 | -9.4% |
| #70 | Lincoln Navigator | 4287 | 4462 | -3.9% | 634 | 633 | 0.2% |
| #71 | Volkswagen Touareg | 3868 | 4933 | -21.6% | 581 | 603 | -3.6% |
| #72 | Infiniti QX70/FX | 3278 | 3941 | -16.8% | 373 | 325 | 14.8% |
| #73 | Lincoln MKT | 3153 | 3693 | -14.6% | 406 | 437 | -7.1% |
| #74 | Volvo XC90 | 3031 | 4183 | -27.5% | 380 | 811 | -53.1% |
| #75 | Porsche Macan | 2978 | --- | --- | 952 | --- | --- |
| #76 | Lincoln MKC | 2895 | --- | --- | 1534 | --- | --- |
| #77 | BMW X6 | 2745 | 3008 | -8.7% | 407 | 212 | 92.0% |
| #78 | Land Rover LR4 | 2614 | 4231 | -38.2% | 533 | 622 | -14.3% |
| #79 | Land Rover LR2 | 2393 | 1723 | 38.9% | 335 | 303 | 10.6% |
| #80 | Lexus LX570 | 2229 | 2308 | -3.4% | 248 | 292 | -15.1% |
| #81 | Mercedes-Benz G-Class | 1738 | 1503 | 15.6% | 252 | 230 | 9.6% |
| #82 | Toyota Land Cruiser | 1706 | 1698 | 0.5% | 213 | 214 | -0.5% |
| #83 | Infiniti QX50/EX | 1653 | 953 | 73.5% | 226 | 128 | 76.6% |
| #84 | Mini Paceman | 1076 | 940 | 14.5% | 149 | 226 | -34.1% |
| #85 | Subaru Tribeca | 648 | 994 | -34.8% | 43 | 128 | -66.4% |
| #86 | BMW X4 | 262 | - | 262 | --- | --- | |
| #87 | Acura ZDX | 63 | 277 | -77.3% | 7 | 41 | -82.9% |
| T88 | Hyundai Veracruz | 1 | 169 | -99.4% | --- | 2 | -100% |
| T88 | Mazda Tribute | 1 | 2 | -50.0% | --- | --- | --- |
| #273 | Jeep Liberty | --- | 6048 | -100% | --- | 60 | -100% |
| #276 | Suzuki Grand Vitara | --- | 1037 | -100% | --- | --- | --- |
| #280 | Mitsubishi Endeavor | --- | 24 | -100% | --- | --- | --- |
| #288 | Honda Element | --- | 2 | -100% | --- | 1 | -100% |
--- | Total | 3,051,905 | 2,718,314 | 12.3% | 470,304 | 402,527 | 16.8% |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
* Italicized, asterisked, unranked lines are nothing more than available breakdowns, already included in the models total, not in addition to the models total.
^ Escalade here does not include sales of the EXT, which is shown with pickup trucks.
Rather than listing the 500L with the Mini Paceman and Countryman in these SUV/crossover rankings, its with cars in large part because it is not available with all-wheel-drive. The placement of numerous crossovers often prompts disagreement, but consider the vehicle types name: crossover. By its very definition, it crosses over from one category into another. The very act of calling, for example, the Toyota Venza a car or a utility vehicle requires ignorance of the fact that the Venza (or Outback, Crosstour, Encore, Countryman, 500L) is a square peg that cant be squeezed through a round hole. BMW, BMW-Mini, and total figures are subject to change as a BMW USA glitch has created some confusion between the X4 and X6 numbers, and thus the totals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
