Showing posts with label s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label s. Show all posts

Monday, March 23, 2015

2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT S AWC Review Bigger Or Cheaper Would Be Better

2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT S-AWC
Priced at $40,538, the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT I drove around for a week in December was disturbingly overpriced.

In Canada, Outlanders start at $27,448. But the GT S-AWC starts at $37,648 with all-wheel-drive, a 6-speed automatic transmission, and a V6 engine in place of the 4-cylinder/CVT combo. A $2730 navigation package and $160 pearlescent paint boost the as-tested price beyond $40,000.

THE GOOD
• Decent ride/handling mix

• Nicely weighted steering
• Impressive Rockford Fosgate
• Available third row
• Only one in the parking lot
THE BAD
• Such tiny buttons
• Interior feels ancient
• $40K+?
• Third row is tight, cramps cargo
• LDW, FCW, but no BSM?

The issue isn’t the manner in which the Outlander’s MSRP compares to the price of other similarly sized two-row utility vehicles. Rather, the problem as I see it is Mitsubishis desire to charge the kind of money other automakers are charging for genuine three-row family crossovers.


• Historical Monthly & Yearly Mitsubishi Outlander Sales Figures
• 2014 Nissan Rogue SL Driven Review


Granted, the Outlander isn’t deserving of criticism because it fails so miserably in any one facet. In fact, the Outlander is simply mediocre in every way. It therefore quickly becomes forgettable, not worthy of mention for any reason other than the combination of tidy exterior dimensions with seven-passenger seating.

Perhaps we got off to a rough start, the Mitsubishi Canada-supplied Outlander and I. Although I’ve read multiple accounts from other publications describing the fits-all-sizes comfort of the Outlander’s driver’s seat, I spent a week failing to find the proper setup for my lanky frame. It’s a personal concern, one which may not apply to your body type, but a seat cushion lacking length and a limited amount of overall adjustment led me to a state of constant discontent.
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT white
2015 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER GT S-AWC
Base Price: $37,648 *
As-Tested Price: $40,538 *
Engine: 3.0L 24-valve SOHC V6
Transmission: 6-speed automatic
Horsepower: 227 @ 6250 rpm
Torque: 215 lb-ft @ 3750 rpm
Curb Weight: 3571 pounds
Drive Type: all-wheel-drive
Length: 183.3 inches
Width: 71.3 inches
Height: 66.1 inches
Wheelbase: 105.1 inches
Tires: Toyo A24
Tire Size: 225/45R18
Passenger Volume: 3630 litres
Cargo Volume: 292 litres
CV Behind 2nd Row: 968 litres
Max. Cargo Volume: 1792 litres
EPA City: 20 mpg
EPA Hwy: 28 mpg
NRCAN OEE City: 11.5 L/100km
NRCAN OEE Hwy: 8.4 L/100km
Observed: 21.4 mpg
Observed: 11.0 L/100km
* Canadian dollars, includes $1450 destination charge.
Outlander base price: $27,448
Outlander AWD base price: $29,448
Outlander V6 AWD 7-seat base price: $32,648
MPG fuel economy ratings from the
Environmental Protection Agency.
L/100km ratings from the Canadian
Office of Energy Efficiencys new
5-cycle testing for MY2015 vehicles.
Second row space is acceptable, however, and access into the third row isn’t as awkward as I expected in a vehicle that’s only five inches longer than a Ford Escape. Yet once back there, well, who goes back there? Who in my life is deserving of that kind of punishment? There’s a decent amount of space for a load of groceries behind the third row (it’s difficult to expect more from most three-row crossovers regardless of size), so Mitsubishi could shove the seat back a smidge. 

As it stands, this isn’t so much a third row for emergencies as it is a third row for emergencies in which you literally take prisoners. The same can’t be said for the third row in the Dodge Durango, which can be had for less money.

Regardless of the row you inhabit, the overall sensation delivered by the 183-inch-long Outlander’s interior does not pertain to smallness or largeness but to cheapness. This feels like 2007-grade material quality. Although all of the third-generation Outlander’s body parts are different from the second-gen’s, at its core this feels like a lighter, updated version of a vehicle which debuted in second-gen form for MY2007.

Interior controls are simple enough, but the buttons surrounding the Rockford Fosgate radio unit are tiny and chintzy. 

The cabin isn’t what you’d call loud, nor is it quiet. One unfortunate caress of the headliner will lead you to believe Mitsubishi sourced the fabric from the late 80s. There are hard, scuffable plastics everywhere you look and touch. This is not the interior of a Toyota Highlander, which can be had for less money.

In motion, the Outlander does redeem itself somewhat. The electrically assisted power steering is nicely weighted and promptly responsive. Ride quality isn’t reflective of the Outlander’s 105.1-inch wheelbase as the comfort-minded suspension and stiff structure don’t allow particularly harsh impacts to transfer to the Outlander’s occupants.

There’s even an initial sense of discreet sportiness, although the Outlander doesn’t possess the limits of the Mazda CX-5, for instance. Instead, when pushed only slightly, the Outlander is more composed than many of the most dynamic small crossovers, but it falls apart more quickly if you decide to drive more enthusiastically than most small crossover owners would.
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT interior
All Photo Credits: Timothy Cain ©www.GoodCarBadCar.net
Click Any Of Images For A Larger View
Mitsubishi’s all-wheel-drive technology features special lock, snow, and eco modes. Called S-AWC for Super All-Wheel Control, the Outlander’s all-wheel-drive system is a $2000 option on the ES; standard on the SE and GT. Although the Outlander’s 6-speed automatic is a willing partner, the naturally-aspirated 3.0L V6 (227 horsepower at a lofty 6250 rpm, 215 lb-ft of torque at 3750 rpm) with which it’s paired doesn’t have what it takes to match turbo four-cylinder powerplants, lacks all manner of low-end punch, and becomes coarse and unruly at higher rpm. By comparison, the 3.3L V6 in Hyundai’s three-row Santa Fe, which can be had for less money, feels like all-American muscle.

I wouldn’t bother to draw attention to much larger competition like the Durango (201 inches long), Highlander (191), or Santa Fe (193) if the Outlander lived up to its window sticker, its spec sheet, and its options list.
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT dashboard
But at this price? For a vehicle of this size? The sunroof is small; not remotely panoramic. The lane departure warning system tended to beep when no beep was necessary and failed to beep when it should have. (Bizarrely, the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT S-AWC Touring includes LDW, forward collision mitigation, and adaptive cruise control, but no blind spot monitoring.) In complete contradiction to its intended purpose, Mitsubishi’s keyless go – they call it FAST-key – required me to remove the key from my pocket almost every time I tried to get in the Outlander. A third row this snug is not a selling feature. A V6 engine could be a key selling feature, but not when it’s the second-least powerful V6 engine on the market today. (Lexus’s 2.5L in the IS250 makes just 204 horsepower.) The Outlander’s 227-horsepower V6 drinks premium fuel at a rate of a 11L/100km, just like the 340-horsepower Porsche Macan S in which we averaged 11.2L/100km. The Porsche can’t be had for less money.


• 2014 Kia Sorento SX Driven Review
• 2013 Dodge Journey R/T Rallye Driven Review


If you can find your local Mitsubishi dealer, you’ll discover that the Outlander won’t be the slowest or the thirstiest SUV. It won’t be the smallest, nor will it be the largest. The Outlander isn’t the most overindulgent, nor is it the most under-equipped. It’s not the prettiest, nor is it the ugliest. It’s not fun to drive like some small crossovers, but it’s not annoying like some others. As a result of its failure to do any one thing particularly well, the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander GT S-AWC is thoroughly underwhelming. Im not inclined to call it a bad vehicle – the Outlander is average in too many ways to earn such a label. Its price, however, is not average. For less money, you can do better.

Perhaps we shouldn’t expect modern results without modern kit underhood. And perhaps we shouldn’t be charged modern prices for outdated vehicles. So say the tens of thousands of small crossover buyers who reject the Outlander each month. For every Outlander sold in Canada over the first ten months of 2014, its three most direct three-row competitors – Rogue, Sorento, Journey – have generated 13 sales. But can Mitsubishi do better? You bet they can, and a plug-in hybrid version of the Outlander is coming in the near future. If nothing else, that level of technology will be something that sets the Outlander apart.
Read more »

Friday, March 20, 2015

2011 Porsche Boxster S Black Edition

PORSCHE BOXSTER S BLACK EDITION




The Porsche Boxster, always nice. For many, the Boxster is a model of entry. In fact it is a car that can discover and experience, at lower costs, the pleasures of the legendary sports car manufacturer. In its design, Porsche has clearly put the emphasis on driving pleasure rather than on performance and the fact that it is proposed that emphasizes convertible this trait. Moreover, if for some builders, entry-level models are not particularly attractive, the Boxster is anything but a low-class Porsche. It is beautifully done and delivers more than reasonable performance for its price. So much for the purists, his brother, the Cayman coupe, which serves as an entry-level racing car at the German manufacturer.



This small Porsche gets basically a six-cylinder engine of 2.9 liter 255 horsepower power. This may seem relatively small for a sports car, but when one considers the weight of the car, it is clear that the level of performance is enviable. The Boxster S with its 3.4-liter V6 and 310 horses, turned a small convertible into a real dragster from 0-100 km / h in under five seconds, 4.6 in the case of Black Boxster Edition equipped with sequential gearbox PDK and Sport Package Plus.


Read more »

Thursday, March 19, 2015

July 2014 U S SUV And Crossover Sales Rankings Top 89 Best Selling SUVs In America Every SUV Ranked

2014 Nissan Rogue red
On an annual basis, U.S. sales of the Nissan Rogue have always increased. But in July 2014, for the second consecutive month, Nissan USA was not able to match last years Rogue sales pace. Rogue sales slid slightly, just 2%, in July 2014 after falling 3% in June. 

Yet the second-generation Rogue has nevertheless proven to be one of Nissans stars. Its Nissans second-best-selling model. Year-to-date, Rogue volume is up 21% in a market thats up 5%; in a vehicle category thats up 12%. 

At this stage last year, the Rogue was 82,926 sales back of the leading SUV. The Rogue has closed the gap by nearly 16,000 units in 2014. 


• U.S. SUV/Crossover Sales Rankings By Model - August 2014 YTD
• U.S. SUV/Crossover Sales Rankings By Model - June 2014 YTD
• U.S. SUV/Crossover Sales Rankings By Model - July 2013 YTD


The Rogue is a top seller, but Nissans steady ascent has not yet made it the top seller. That role belongs to the Honda CR-V, just as it did at this stage two years ago. The CR-V trailed the Ford Escape by 5980 units at the seven-month mark in 2013 but ended the year as Americas top-selling utility vehicle after generating 130,915 sales in the final five months of 2013.

Moreover, the Rogue is competing with other vehicles which are also steadily increasing their U.S. sales tallies, though not quite as quickly. July was the Toyota RAV4s best-ever sales month - RAV4 sales are up 19% in 2014. 

Embattled GM has produced improved Chevrolet Equinox sales in each of the last five years, and against the grain of the news, produced a 37% jump in Equinox sales in July. 
2014 BMW X4
The fifth-best-selling Ford Explorer, meanwhile, is Americas top-selling three-row vehicle. And it attracts cops, which few SUVs do, to the tune of 9.5% of its U.S. volume. 

The Rogue is more than a symbol of Nissans U.S. auto market success. But taken as a symbol, its a very meaningful one.


• Top 13 Best-Selling Pickup Trucks In America - July 2014 YTD
• Commercial Van Sales In America - July 2014 YTD
• Minivan Sales In America - July 2014 YTD


There were important improvements introduced in last Octobers ranking of SUV/crossover sales. Prior year figures now include the actual numbers from last year, not just the percentage increase from last year. As a result, weve included vehicles like the Suzuki Grand Vitara and Honda Element, nameplates which collected sales in the first half of 2013 but not this year. At any time, click the Rank column to return to the original format. If youre on a mobile device, you may need to choose the full version of the site (at the bottom of the page) in order to use the sortable function.


• U.S. Auto Sales Brand Rankings - July 2014 YTD
• U.S. Car Sales Rankings - July 2014 YTD
U.S. Vehicle Sales Rankings - July 2014 YTD


Reminder: these are 2014 year-to-date rankings, but you can sort SUVs and crossovers by July volume by clicking the July 2014 column header, or you can rank vehicles by improvements or declines using the % columns. Or, most importantly, you can list automakers together by selecting the SUV/Crossover column header.

As always, you can find historical monthly and yearly sales figures for any of these vehicles by selecting a make and model at GCBCs Sales Stats page.

Click Column Headers To Sort • August 2014 • June 2014 • July 2013
Rank
SUV/Crossover
July
2014
YTD
July
2013
YTD
%
Change
July
2014
July
2013
% Change
#1Honda CR-V183,214 172,989 5.9%28,522 27,226 4.8%
#2Ford Escape179,448 178,969 0.3%26,558 22,343 18.9%
#3Chevrolet Equinox146,152 144,904 0.9%25,321 18,507 36.8%
#4Toyota RAV4143,731 120,812 19.0%26,779 19,538 37.1%
#5Ford Explorer123,466 115,332 7.1%19,006 14,089 34.9%
#5.1Ford Explorer *111,785108,0443.5%16,79712,74231.8%
#5.2Ford Explorer Police Interceptor *11,681728860.3%2209134764.0%
#6Nissan Rogue115,920 96,043 20.7%16,618 16,992 -2.2%
#7Jeep Grand Cherokee104,782 95,815 9.4%15,169 15,019 1.0%
#8Jeep Wrangler102,125 92,132 10.8%16,388 14,404 13.8%
#9Jeep Cherokee95,259 ------14,827 ------
#10Subaru Forester88,924 60,589 46.8%14,524 984147.6%
#11Toyota Highlander83,495 72,679 14.9%11,357 10,908 4.1%
#12Ford Edge69,632 79,512 -12.4%856410,541 -18.8%
#13Honda Pilot61,613 75,819 -18.7%10,933 12,932 -15.5%
#14Chevrolet Traverse61,586 60,910 1.1%9533761625.2%
#15GMC Terrain61,454 58,531 5.0%10,767 785537.1%
#16Kia Sorento60,670 62,963 -3.6%87499576-8.6%
#17Hyundai Santa Fe60,660 48,003 26.4%8655684526.4%
#18Mazda CX-559,384 45,880 29.4%9109782516.4%
#19Lexus RX56,922 54,255 4.9%9658843714.5%
#20Chevrolet Tahoe56,621 47,976 18.0%10,783 711951.5%
#21Dodge Journey54,309 48,944 11.0%7158650810.0%
#22Jeep Patriot51,721 45,687 13.2%779375722.9%
#23GMC Acadia49,265 54,056 -8.9%809575647.0%
#24Nissan Pathfinder47,328 54,967 -13.9%73648428-12.6%
#25Toyota 4Runner41,955 29,476 42.3%6662404964.5%
#26Jeep Compass38,503 32,000 20.3%541152223.6%
#27Dodge Durango37,682 33,440 12.7%48075135-6.4%
#28Acura MDX36,947 23,765 55.5%6283555113.2%
#29Buick Enclave35,408 36,804 -3.8%526649636.1%
#30Cadillac SRX33,463 28,933 15.7%45994943-7.0%
#31Chevrolet Captiva Sport33,308 27,310 22.0%4497254876.5%
#32Chevrolet Suburban28,739 27,844 3.2%51686181-16.4%
#33Hyundai Tucson28,103 26,156 7.4%37673949-4.6%
#34Nissan Juke28,086 21,357 31.5%23253579-35.0%
#35Buick Encore27,718 15,428 79.7%4061317627.9%
#36Ford Expedition26,470 20,485 29.2%4371274459.3%
#37Acura RDX25,881 26,136 -1.0%35323936-10.3%
#38Mercedes-Benz M-Class25,216 22,404 12.6%327630926.0%
#39BMW X525,126 24,133 4.1%268826740.5%
#40Nissan Murano25,065 24,374 2.8%4640378722.5%
#41Kia Sportage24,368 17,897 36.2%4412252374.9%
#42BMW X323,367 16,339 43.0%15652099-25.4%
#43Audi Q523,117 21,486 7.6%318931760.4%
#44GMC Yukon22,743 14,895 52.7%4139279048.4%
#45Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class22,508 18,526 21.5%3870278039.2%
#46Mitsubishi Outlander Sport17,932 14,522 23.5%2610207525.8%
#47Infiniti QX60/JX17,831 17,530 1.7%22322747-18.7%
#48GMC Yukon XL16,444 17,847 -7.9%3999314327.2%
#49Volkswagen Tiguan15,295 17,796 -14.1%21212270-6.6%
#50Lincoln MKX15,080 13,653 10.5%19832002-0.9%
#51Ford Flex14,884 15,525 -4.1%18952689-29.5%
#52Cadillac Escalade14,30011,29726.6%38941793117%
#52.1Cadillac Escalade *9138678234.7%24671105123%
#52.2Cadillac Escalade ESV *5162451514.3%1427688 107%
#53Mercedes-Benz GL-Class13,366 17,111 -21.9%16402165-24.2%
#54Mini Countryman12,804 12,774 0.2%21832211-1.3%
#55BMW X112,314 14,226 -13.4%10032157-53.5%
#56Lexus GX46012,231 5296131%1955881122%
#57Land Rover Range Rover Sport11,420 794743.7%1614752115%
#58Mazda CX-910,931 16,756 -34.8%16782084-19.5%
#59Nissan Xterra10,838 11,326 -4.3%10731218-11.9%
#60Volvo XC6010,516 12,293 -14.5%17321740-0.5%
#61Porsche Cayenne10,259 11,082 -7.4%15461563-1.1%
#62Audi Q79881790824.9%144613288.9%
#63Toyota FJ Cruiser9661785423.0%1424126013.0%
#64Mitsubishi Outlander7967635525.4%951 1268-25.0%
#65Nissan Armada74058487-12.7%948 1106-14.3%
#66Land Rover Range Rover723867407.4%12731420-10.4%
#67Infiniti QX80/QX56717067476.3%952 78022.1%
#68Land Rover Range Rover Evoque7164639312.1%888 953-6.8%
#69Toyota Sequoia69017765-11.1%971 1072-9.4%
#70Lincoln Navigator42874462-3.9%634 633 0.2%
#71Volkswagen Touareg38684933-21.6%581 603 -3.6%
#72Infiniti QX70/FX32783941-16.8%373 325 14.8%
#73Lincoln MKT31533693-14.6%406 437 -7.1%
#74Volvo XC9030314183-27.5%380 811 -53.1%
#75Porsche Macan2978------952 ------
#76Lincoln MKC2895------1534------
#77BMW X627453008-8.7%407212 92.0%
#78Land Rover LR426144231-38.2%533 622 -14.3%
#79Land Rover LR22393172338.9%335 303 10.6%
#80Lexus LX57022292308-3.4%248 292 -15.1%
#81Mercedes-Benz G-Class1738150315.6%252 230 9.6%
#82Toyota Land Cruiser170616980.5%213 214 -0.5%
#83Infiniti QX50/EX165395373.5%226 128 76.6%
#84Mini Paceman1076940 14.5%149 226 -34.1%
#85Subaru Tribeca648 994 -34.8%43 128 -66.4%
#86BMW X4262 -
262 ------
#87Acura ZDX63 277 -77.3%7 41 -82.9%
T88Hyundai Veracruz1 169 -99.4%---2 -100%
T88Mazda Tribute1 2 -50.0%---------
#273Jeep Liberty---6048-100%---60 -100%
#276Suzuki Grand Vitara---1037-100%---------
#280Mitsubishi Endeavor---24 -100%---------
#288Honda Element---2 -100%---1 -100%
---
Total
3,051,9052,718,31412.3% 470,304 402,527 16.8%
---
---
------ --- --- --- ---
Source: Automakers & ANDC
* Italicized, asterisked, unranked lines are nothing more than available breakdowns, already included in the models total, not in addition to the models total.
^ Escalade here does not include sales of the EXT, which is shown with pickup trucks.
Rather than listing the 500L with the Mini Paceman and Countryman in these SUV/crossover rankings, its with cars in large part because it is not available with all-wheel-drive. The placement of numerous crossovers often prompts disagreement, but consider the vehicle types name: crossover. By its very definition, it crosses over from one category into another. The very act of calling, for example, the Toyota Venza a car or a utility vehicle requires ignorance of the fact that the Venza (or Outback, Crosstour, Encore, Countryman, 500L) is a square peg that cant be squeezed through a round hole. BMW, BMW-Mini, and total figures are subject to change as a BMW USA glitch has created some confusion between the X4 and X6 numbers, and thus the totals.

Read more »